- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah vs Nao LT
Milwaukee BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah vs Petzl Nao LT
What BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah does better (0) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Brightness & throw4.6
2.6Battery & charging5.1
Why is BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah better than Nao LT?
BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Nao LT better than BOLT Helm-Stirnlampe 3.0Ah?
- Maximum runtime12 h vs 85 h7.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 12 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
