- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- ISHL-LED vs Nao LT
Milwaukee ISHL-LED vs Petzl Nao LT
What ISHL-LED does better (1) and where Nao LT wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is ISHL-LED better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 75 m+33%
Why is Nao LT better than ISHL-LED?
- Maximum output310 lm vs 600 lm+94%
- Maximum runtime8 h vs 85 h10.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 310 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 3 | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 8 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | Yellow | — |
