- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E52D vs TA30C Max
Nextorch E52D vs Nextorch TA30C Max
What E52D does better (1) and where TA30C Max wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E52DTA30C Max
| E52D | TA30C Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 153 mm | 153 mm | = |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 38 mm | −8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E52D better than TA30C Max?
- Maximum output3,700 lm vs 3,000 lm+23%
Why is TA30C Max better than E52D?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)280 m vs 390 m+39%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,700 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 19,600 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 280 m | 390 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 153 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 38 mm |
| Weight | 130 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
