- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- hiStar Helmet vs UT2000
Nextorch hiStar Helmet vs Nitecore UT2000
What hiStar Helmet does better (3) and where UT2000 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Brightness & throw9.0
3.3Battery & charging7.2
4.1Build & durability7.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is hiStar Helmet better than UT2000?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)256 m vs 220 m+16%
- Maximum output2,300 lm vs 2,000 lm+15%
- Peak beam intensity16,384 cd vs 12,126 cd+35%
Why is UT2000 better than hiStar Helmet?
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 12,000 mAh3.5×
- Maximum runtime2.2 h vs 55 h25×
- Impact resistance (drop)1 m vs 2 m2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Weight126 g vs 122 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,300 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,384 cd | 12,126 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 256 m | 220 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 97 |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 12,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 2.2 h | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 1 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Magnesium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 126 g | 122 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
