- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K3 V2.0 vs UT30
Nextorch K3 V2.0 vs Nextorch UT30
What K3 V2.0 does better (3) and where UT30 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is K3 V2.0 better than UT30?
- Weight28 g vs 41 g+46%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)60 m vs 55 m+9%
- Peak beam intensity900 cd vs 760 cd+18%
Why is UT30 better than K3 V2.0?
- Maximum output250 lm vs 320 lm+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 250 lm | 320 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 900 cd | 760 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 60 m | 55 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 640 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 20 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 14 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | — |
| Weight | 28 g | 41 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
