How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. K3 V2.0 vs E2 PULSE

Nextorch K3 V2.0 vs Wuben E2 PULSE

What K3 V2.0 does better (3) and where E2 PULSE wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Nextorch K3 V2.0
Nextorch · 2023K3 V2.0
5.1Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Wuben E2 PULSE
Wuben · 2026E2 PULSE
4.6Score
2 advantages≈ $20
4.8Brightness & throw3.9
5.8Build & durability5.4
5.9Features5.9

Why is K3 V2.0 better than E2 PULSE?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)60 m vs 26 m2.3×
  2. Peak beam intensity900 cd vs 170 cd5.3×
  3. Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx6+17%

Why is E2 PULSE better than K3 V2.0?

  1. Maximum output250 lm vs 500 lm2×
  2. Impact resistance (drop)1 m vs 1.5 m+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Wuben E2 PULSEWuben E2 PULSE≈ $204.6
Light output
Maximum output250 lm500 lm
Peak beam intensity900 cd170 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)60 m26 m
Light sourceLEDCOB LED panel
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-G—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
BatteryAAA—
Maximum runtime20 h—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIPX7IP66
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx6
Impact resistance (drop)1 m1.5 m
Body materialAluminium—
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clip—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height150 mm—
Head diameter / width14 mm—
Body diameter / depth12 mm—
Weight28 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels4—
StrobeYes—
Mode memoryYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare