- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EDC35 vs Angel Eyes E90
Nitecore EDC35 vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E90
What EDC35 does better (3) and where Angel Eyes E90 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Brightness & throw8.1
8.2Battery & charging4.8
9.3Build & durability7.3
5.9Features5.9
Why is EDC35 better than Angel Eyes E90?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh2×
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+43%
- Impact resistance (drop)2 m vs 1.5 m+33%
Why is Angel Eyes E90 better than EDC35?
Angel Eyes E90 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 75,620 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 550 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | NiteLab UHi 40 MAX | — |
| LED maker | NiteLab | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 90 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 105 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
