- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HA29 UHE MCT vs HC60 UHE
Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT vs Nitecore HC60 UHE
What HA29 UHE MCT does better (3) and where HC60 UHE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Brightness & throw7.4
7.9Battery & charging8.8
7.8Build & durability7.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than HC60 UHE?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)169 m vs 157 m+8%
- Weight112 g vs 140 g+25%
- Peak beam intensity7,140 cd vs 6,170 cd+16%
Why is HC60 UHE better than HA29 UHE MCT?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,600 lm+33%
- Maximum runtime122 h vs 200 h+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,140 cd | 6,170 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 169 m | 157 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 6 |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | 18650 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 122 h | 200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 112 g | 140 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
