- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HA29 UHE MCT vs NWH20
Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT vs Nitecore NWH20
What HA29 UHE MCT does better (6) and where NWH20 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Brightness & throw4.5
7.9Battery & charging4.7
7.8Build & durability4.7
5.7Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than NWH20?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 600 lm2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)169 m vs 89 m+90%
- Peak beam intensity7,140 cd vs 1,980 cd3.6×
- Maximum runtime122 h vs 51 h2.4×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Weight112 g vs 149 g+33%
Why is NWH20 better than HA29 UHE MCT?
NWH20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,140 cd | 1,980 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 169 m | 89 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | 4,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Maximum runtime | 122 h | 51 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 112 g | 149 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
