- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HA29 UHE MCT vs Nao LT
Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT vs Petzl Nao LT
What HA29 UHE MCT does better (4) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Brightness & throw4.3
7.9Battery & charging4.6
7.8Build & durability8.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)169 m vs 75 m2.3×
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 600 lm2×
- Peak beam intensity7,140 cd vs 1,410 cd5.1×
- Maximum runtime122 h vs 85 h+44%
Why is Nao LT better than HA29 UHE MCT?
- Weight112 g vs 90 g+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,140 cd | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 169 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 122 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 112 g | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
