- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HC65 MCT vs HC75 UHE
Nitecore HC65 MCT vs Nitecore HC75 UHE
What HC65 MCT does better (4) and where HC75 UHE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is HC65 MCT better than HC75 UHE?
- Maximum runtime154 h vs 84 h+83%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)258 m vs 192 m+34%
- Peak beam intensity16,709 cd vs 9,216 cd+81%
- Weight146 g vs 209 g+43%
Why is HC75 UHE better than HC65 MCT?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 3,000 lm+50%
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,709 cd | 9,216 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 258 m | 192 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 8 | 8 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 98 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | 4,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 154 h | 84 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Magnesium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 146 g | 209 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
