- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HC65M V2.0 vs HC75 UHE
Nitecore HC65M V2.0 vs Nitecore HC75 UHE
What HC65M V2.0 does better (1) and where HC75 UHE wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw8.7
8.4Battery & charging7.8
5.9Build & durability6.4
5.9Features5.9
Why is HC65M V2.0 better than HC75 UHE?
- Maximum runtime110 h vs 84 h+31%
Why is HC75 UHE better than HC65M V2.0?
- Maximum output1,750 lm vs 3,000 lm+71%
- Battery capacity3,500 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+57%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)165 m vs 192 m+16%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,750 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 9,216 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 165 m | 192 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 8 |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | 84 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 209 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
