- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MH10 V2.0 vs MT21C
Nitecore MH10 V2.0 vs Nitecore MT21C
What MH10 V2.0 does better (2) and where MT21C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MH10 V2.0MT21C
| MH10 V2.0 | MT21C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 130 mm | 131 mm | −1 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25 mm | 25 mm | = |
| Weight | 75 g | 104 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than MT21C?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)232 m vs 184 m+26%
- Weight75 g vs 104 g+39%
Why is MT21C better than MH10 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime520 h vs 700 h+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 232 m | 184 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 520 h | 700 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 130 mm | 131 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 104 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
