- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MH10 V2.0 vs TUP
Nitecore MH10 V2.0 vs Nitecore TUP
What MH10 V2.0 does better (2) and where TUP wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MH10 V2.0TUP
| MH10 V2.0 | TUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 130 mm | 71 mm | +59 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25 mm | 30 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 54 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than TUP?
- Maximum runtime520 h vs 70 h7.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)232 m vs 180 m+29%
Why is TUP better than MH10 V2.0?
- Weight75 g vs 54 g+39%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 232 m | 180 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 520 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 130 mm | 71 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25 mm | 30 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 54 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
