- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- MH12 V2.0 vs Angel Eyes E200
Nitecore MH12 V2.0 vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E200
What MH12 V2.0 does better (1) and where Angel Eyes E200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Brightness & throw4.1
9.8Battery & charging5.8
9.6Build & durability8.2
Why is MH12 V2.0 better than Angel Eyes E200?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)202 m vs 118 m+71%
Why is Angel Eyes E200 better than MH12 V2.0?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,650 lm+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,650 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 3,480 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 202 m | 118 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 47 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 1,500 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 0.8 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 158 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 84 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
