- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Thumb vs Eco Run
Nitecore Thumb vs Troika Eco Run
What Thumb does better (1) and where Eco Run wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
ThumbEco Run
| Thumb | Eco Run | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 74 mm | 35 mm | +39 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 25 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 25 g | 32 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Thumb better than Eco Run?
- Weight25 g vs 32 g+28%
Why is Eco Run better than Thumb?
Eco Run has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 85 lm | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 26 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 22 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 74 mm | 35 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 25 mm |
| Weight | 25 g | 32 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
