- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TUBE V2.0 vs Aurora A9
Nitecore TUBE V2.0 vs RovyVon Aurora A9
What TUBE V2.0 does better (1) and where Aurora A9 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is TUBE V2.0 better than Aurora A9?
- USB-C chargingYes · Aurora A9: No
Why is Aurora A9 better than TUBE V2.0?
- Maximum output50 lm vs 650 lm13×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 50 lm | 650 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 260 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Charging time | — | 1.2 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Body material | — | Copper |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 57.3 mm |
| Weight | — | 40 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
