- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT2000 vs UT27
Nitecore UT2000 vs Nitecore UT27
What UT2000 does better (7) and where UT27 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT2000 better than UT27?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 800 lm2.5×
- Battery capacity12,000 mAh vs 1,500 mAh8×
- Maximum runtime55 h vs 14 h3.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 168 m+31%
- Peak beam intensity12,126 cd vs 7,124 cd+70%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Impact resistance (drop)2 m vs 1 m2×
Why is UT27 better than UT2000?
- Weight122 g vs 74 g+65%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,126 cd | 7,124 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 168 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 97 | 97 |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 12,000 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 55 h | 14 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 122 g | 74 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
