- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT6 MCT vs Xena
Nitecore UT6 MCT vs Petzl Xena
What UT6 MCT does better (2) and where Xena wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT6 MCT better than Xena?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)195 m vs 170 m+15%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is Xena better than UT6 MCT?
- Maximum runtime31 h vs 32 h+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | — |
| Peak beam intensity | 9,510 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 195 m | 170 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Number of batteries | — | 4 |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | 32 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 4 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Magnesium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | — | 100 mm |
| Weight | — | 185 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
