- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT6 MCT vs ZB9H
Nitecore UT6 MCT vs Zweibrüder ZB9H
What UT6 MCT does better (0) and where ZB9H wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT6 MCT better than ZB9H?
UT6 MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is ZB9H better than UT6 MCT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)195 m vs 260 m+33%
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 2,000 lm+25%
- Maximum runtime31 h vs 50 h+61%
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 9,510 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 195 m | 260 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Magnesium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 252 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
