- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Nao LT vs PIXA R
Petzl Nao LT vs Petzl PIXA R
What Nao LT does better (2) and where PIXA R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Nao LT better than PIXA R?
- Maximum runtime85 h vs 12 h7.1×
- Weight90 g vs 130 g+44%
Why is PIXA R better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)75 m vs 90 m+20%
- Peak beam intensity1,410 cd vs 2,020 cd+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,410 cd | 2,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 75 m | 90 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | 12 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black, Yellow |
