- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Nao LT vs Workflex Motion Sensor H20
Petzl Nao LT vs VARTA Workflex Motion Sensor H20
What Nao LT does better (1) and where Workflex Motion Sensor H20 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Brightness & throw3.0
8.2Build & durability2.4
5.9Features5.9
Why is Nao LT better than Workflex Motion Sensor H20?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is Workflex Motion Sensor H20 better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)75 m vs 78 m+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | — |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,410 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 75 m | 78 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 90 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
