- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Novalight 850 Tec vs R3
Scubapro Novalight 850 Tec vs Seac R3
What Novalight 850 Tec does better (3) and where R3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Brightness & throw2.6
8.7Battery & charging3.7
9.0Build & durability6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Novalight 850 TecR3
| Novalight 850 Tec | R3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 253 mm | 140 mm | +113 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | 42 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 288 g | 255 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Novalight 850 Tec better than R3?
- Maximum output850 lm vs 400 lm2.1×
- Maximum runtime7 h vs 2 h3.5×
- Submersible to300 m vs 100 m3×
Why is R3 better than Novalight 850 Tec?
- Weight288 g vs 255 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 850 lm | 400 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 1 |
| Colour temperature | 4,200K | 7,300K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 7 h | 2 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 300 m | 100 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 253 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | 42 mm |
| Weight | 288 g | 255 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Oceama SpidervsScubapro Novalight 850 Tec7.37.9
vsOceama SharkvsScubapro Novalight 850 Tec8.47.9vs
Scubapro Novalight 850 TecvsOceama Ray7.98.6vs
Scubapro Novalight 850 TecvsOceama Bonito7.98.8
vsMares EOS 25LRvsScubapro Novalight 850 Tec7.17.9vs
Scubapro Novalight 850 TecvsSeaLife Sea Dragon Mini 1300S Power7.98.2