How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Shark vs Novalight 850 Tec

Oceama Shark vs Scubapro Novalight 850 Tec

What Shark does better (1) and where Novalight 850 Tec wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Oceama Shark
Oceama · 2024Shark
8.4Score
1 advantage≈ $260
Higher score
vs
Scubapro Novalight 850 Tec
Scubapro · 2024Novalight 850 Tec
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $180
8.8Brightness & throw3.6
4.3Battery & charging8.7
3.1Build & durability9.0

Why is Shark better than Novalight 850 Tec?

  1. Maximum output2,500 lm vs 850 lm2.9×

Why is Novalight 850 Tec better than Shark?

  1. Maximum runtime1.5 h vs 7 h4.7×
  2. Weight496 g vs 288 g+72%
  3. Submersible to100 m vs 300 m3×
Specifications

Side by side

Oceama SharkOceama Shark≈ $2608.4
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm850 lm
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP50.2Cree XP-L
LED makerCreeCree
Number of LEDs—1
Colour temperature—4,200K
Battery & charging
Battery26650 Li-ion—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime1.5 h7 h
RechargeableYes—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to100 m300 m
Body materialAluminium—
Size & weight
Length / height200 mm253 mm
Head diameter / width—45 mm
Weight496 g288 g
Modes & features
SOS / beaconYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare