- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs E06R PRO
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix E06R PRO
What E10 2.0 does better (3) and where E06R PRO wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E10 2.0E06R PRO
| E10 2.0 | E06R PRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 88 mm | 123 mm | −35 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 31 mm | +9 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 19 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 104 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E10 2.0 better than E06R PRO?
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 6,400 cd2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 160 m+51%
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 111 h+8%
Why is E06R PRO better than E10 2.0?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,600 lm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 6,400 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 160 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,650 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 111 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | 123 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 31 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 19 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 104 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
