- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs LD12R
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix LD12R
What E10 2.0 does better (4) and where LD12R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E10 2.0LD12R
| E10 2.0 | LD12R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 88 mm | 121 mm | −33 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 22 mm | +18 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 19 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 74 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E10 2.0 better than LD12R?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 600 lm2×
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 16.3 h7.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 186 m+30%
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 8,650 cd+68%
Why is LD12R better than E10 2.0?
- Weight106 g vs 74 g+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 8,650 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 186 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | 14500 Li-ion, AA |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 16.3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | 121 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 22 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 19 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 74 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
