- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs LD22 V2.0
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix LD22 V2.0
What E10 2.0 does better (3) and where LD22 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E10 2.0LD22 V2.0
| E10 2.0 | LD22 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 88 mm | 148 mm | −60 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 21 mm | +19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 18 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 96 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E10 2.0 better than LD22 V2.0?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 800 lm+50%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 214 m+13%
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 11,450 cd+27%
Why is LD22 V2.0 better than E10 2.0?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 220 h+83%
- Weight106 g vs 96 g+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 11,450 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 214 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | AA |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 220 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | 148 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 21 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 18 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 96 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
