- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs PD25R
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix PD25R
What E10 2.0 does better (2) and where PD25R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is E10 2.0 better than PD25R?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 800 lm+50%
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 80 h+50%
Why is PD25R better than E10 2.0?
- Weight106 g vs 78 g+36%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 250 m+4%
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 15,620 cd+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 15,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 250 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | 92 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | 78 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
