- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs EDC15
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Nitecore EDC15
What E10 2.0 does better (3) and where EDC15 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is E10 2.0 better than EDC15?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 208 m+16%
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 10,886 cd+33%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is EDC15 better than E10 2.0?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 200 h+67%
- Weight106 g vs 85 g+25%
- Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 2 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 10,886 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 208 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,050 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | 85 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
