How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E10 2.0 vs L1

Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Wuben L1

What E10 2.0 does better (1) and where L1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam E10 2.0
Acebeam · 2026E10 2.0
6.8Score
1 advantage≈ $60
vs
Wuben L1
Wuben · 2025L1
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
4.3Brightness & throw5.9
8.5Battery & charging7.5
7.3Build & durability6.8

Why is E10 2.0 better than L1?

  1. Maximum runtime120 h vs 90 h+33%

Why is L1 better than E10 2.0?

  1. Maximum output1,200 lm vs 2,000 lm+67%
  2. Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 30,620 cd2.1×
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 350 m+45%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam E10 2.0Acebeam E10 2.0≈ $606.8
Wuben L1Wuben L1≈ $558.0
Light output
Maximum output1,200 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity14,520 cd30,620 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m350 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED makerCreeOsram
Colour rendering (CRI)—90
Battery & charging
Battery16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A—
Maximum runtime120 h90 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Power bank function—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m1.5 m
Body materialAluminium—
Magnetic tail / baseYesYes
Size & weight
Length / height88 mm—
Head diameter / width40 mm—
Body diameter / depth24.5 mm—
Weight106 g—
Modes & features
SwitchSide switchTail switch
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare