- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E75 vs E52C
Acebeam E75 vs Nextorch E52C
What E75 does better (3) and where E52C wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E75E52C
| E75 | E52C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | 153 mm | −23.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 30 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 130 g | +87 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E75 better than E52C?
- Maximum output4,500 lm vs 3,000 lm+50%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)260 m vs 210 m+24%
- Peak beam intensity16,900 cd vs 11,025 cd+53%
Why is E52C better than E75?
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 65 h4.1×
- Weight217 g vs 130 g+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,500 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,900 cd | 11,025 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 260 m | 210 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 519A | — |
| LED maker | Nichia | — |
| Number of LEDs | 51 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 65 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | — |
| Weight | 217 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Colours | Grey, Blue, Silver, Black, Green | — |
