- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E75 vs Angel Eyes E90
Acebeam E75 vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E90
What E75 does better (2) and where Angel Eyes E90 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Brightness & throw8.1
4.6Battery & charging4.8
5.9Build & durability7.3
8.6Light quality5.5
5.9Features5.9
Why is E75 better than Angel Eyes E90?
- Maximum output4,500 lm vs 3,500 lm+29%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh+67%
Why is Angel Eyes E90 better than E75?
- Weight217 g vs 105 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,500 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,900 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 260 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 519A | — |
| LED maker | Nichia | — |
| Number of LEDs | 51 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | 6,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | — |
| Weight | 217 g | 105 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | Grey, Blue, Silver, Black, Green | — |
