- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC50 III vs PD35 V2.0 Digital
Acebeam EC50 III vs Fenix PD35 V2.0 Digital
What EC50 III does better (3) and where PD35 V2.0 Digital wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Brightness & throw5.2
9.7Battery & charging9.6
7.3Build & durability8.8
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
EC50 IIIPD35 V2.0 Digital
| EC50 III | PD35 V2.0 Digital | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 132 mm | 138 mm | −6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm | +14.6 mm |
| Weight | 120 g | 88 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EC50 III better than PD35 V2.0 Digital?
- Maximum output3,850 lm vs 1,000 lm3.8×
- Maximum runtime1,200 h vs 430 h2.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)326 m vs 250 m+30%
Why is PD35 V2.0 Digital better than EC50 III?
- Weight120 g vs 88 g+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,850 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 15,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 326 m | 250 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 26650 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 1,200 h | 430 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 132 mm | 138 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23 mm |
| Weight | 120 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
