- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC50 III vs UC52
Acebeam EC50 III vs Fenix UC52
What EC50 III does better (4) and where UC52 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
EC50 IIIUC52
| EC50 III | UC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 132 mm | 153.5 mm | −21.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 120 g | 275 g | −155 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EC50 III better than UC52?
- Maximum runtime1,200 h vs 82.5 h14.5×
- Weight120 g vs 275 g2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)326 m vs 253 m+29%
- Maximum output3,850 lm vs 3,100 lm+24%
Why is UC52 better than EC50 III?
UC52 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,850 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 16,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 326 m | 253 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 26650 Li-ion | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 1,200 h | 82.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 132 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 26 mm |
| Weight | 120 g | 275 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | — | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
