- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC50 III vs X9R Marauder
Acebeam EC50 III vs Olight X9R Marauder
What EC50 III does better (2) and where X9R Marauder wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Brightness & throw9.4
9.7Battery & charging4.2
7.3Build & durability2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
EC50 IIIX9R Marauder
| EC50 III | X9R Marauder | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 132 mm | 320 mm | −188 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 100 mm | −60 mm |
| Weight | 120 g | 1,855 g | −1,735 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EC50 III better than X9R Marauder?
- Maximum runtime1,200 h vs 27 h44.4×
- Weight120 g vs 1,855 g15.5×
Why is X9R Marauder better than EC50 III?
- Maximum output3,850 lm vs 25,000 lm6.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)326 m vs 630 m+93%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,850 lm | 25,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 326 m | 630 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 6 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 26650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 1,200 h | 27 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 132 mm | 320 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 100 mm |
| Weight | 120 g | 1,855 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
