- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs HM61R Multi-Use
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Fenix HM61R Multi-Use
What H50 2.0 does better (2) and where HM61R Multi-Use wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Brightness & throw6.4
3.7Battery & charging8.8
8.3Build & durability8.1
8.9Light quality8.9
Why is H50 2.0 better than HM61R Multi-Use?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+67%
- Weight94 g vs 99 g+5%
Why is HM61R Multi-Use better than H50 2.0?
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 300 h7.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 145 m+3%
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 5,260 cd+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 5,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 145 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 300 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | 101 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 46 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 36 mm |
| Weight | 94 g | 99 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | — | Side switch |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
