How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. H50 2.0 vs oStar

Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Nextorch oStar

What H50 2.0 does better (4) and where oStar wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam H50 2.0
Acebeam · 2023H50 2.0
8.7Score
4 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Nextorch oStar
Nextorch · 2022oStar
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ $85
7.2Brightness & throw5.6
3.7Battery & charging4.8
8.3Build & durability5.3

Why is H50 2.0 better than oStar?

  1. Maximum output2,000 lm vs 500 lm4×
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 131 m+8%
  4. Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 4,290 cd+16%

Why is oStar better than H50 2.0?

  1. Maximum runtime40 h vs 60 h+50%
  2. Weight94 g vs 87 g+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam H50 2.0Acebeam H50 2.0≈ $908.7
Nextorch oStarNextorch oStar≈ $855.6
Light output
Maximum output2,000 lm500 lm
Peak beam intensity4,968 cd4,290 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m131 m
Runtime at maximum output240 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-20—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs3—
Colour temperature5,000K—
Battery & charging
Battery—18650 Li-ion
Maximum runtime40 h60 h
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IPX4
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Impact resistance (drop)—2 m
Size & weight
Length / height85 mm78 mm
Head diameter / width—65 mm
Body diameter / depth—46 mm
Weight94 g87 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SOS / beaconYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare