How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. H50 2.0 vs rStar

Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Nextorch rStar

What H50 2.0 does better (5) and where rStar wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam H50 2.0
Acebeam · 2023H50 2.0
8.7Score
5 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Nextorch rStar
Nextorch · 2023rStar
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $85
7.2Brightness & throw2.0
8.3Build & durability6.3

Why is H50 2.0 better than rStar?

  1. Maximum output2,000 lm vs 80 lm25×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 10 m14.1×
  3. Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 40 cd124.2×
  4. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  5. Maximum runtime40 h vs 38 h+5%

Why is rStar better than H50 2.0?

  1. Weight94 g vs 50 g+88%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam H50 2.0Acebeam H50 2.0≈ $908.7
Nextorch rStarNextorch rStar≈ $854.5
Light output
Maximum output2,000 lm80 lm
Peak beam intensity4,968 cd40 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m10 m
Runtime at maximum output240 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-20—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs3—
Colour temperature5,000K—
Battery & charging
Battery—AA
Maximum runtime40 h38 h
RechargeableYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IPX4
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Impact resistance (drop)—2 m
Pocket clip—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height85 mm133 mm
Head diameter / width—41 mm
Body diameter / depth—30 mm
Weight94 g50 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SOS / beaconYesYes
Red light—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare