How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. K75 2.0 vs W30 LEP

Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Acebeam W30 LEP

What K75 2.0 does better (3) and where W30 LEP wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam K75 2.0
Acebeam · 2023K75 2.0
9.4Score
3 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Acebeam W30 LEP
Acebeam · 2021W30 LEP
0 advantages≈ $400
9.0Brightness & throw7.5

Why is K75 2.0 better than W30 LEP?

  1. Maximum output6,500 lm vs 500 lm13×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 2,408 m+13%
  3. Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 1,450,000 cd+27%

Why is W30 LEP better than K75 2.0?

W30 LEP has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam K75 2.0Acebeam K75 2.0≈ $3509.4
Light output
Maximum output6,500 lm500 lm
Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd1,450,000 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m2,408 m
Runtime at maximum output1 min—
Light sourceLEDLEP (laser-excited phosphor)
LED & beam
LED makerLuminus—
Battery & charging
Maximum runtime31 h—
Build & durability
Submersible to—100 m
Size & weight
Length / height—199.1 mm
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare