How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. K75 2.0 vs SR32

Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Imalent SR32

What K75 2.0 does better (2) and where SR32 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam K75 2.0
Acebeam · 2023K75 2.0
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Imalent SR32
Imalent · 2023SR32
1 advantage≈ $680
9.0Brightness & throw9.8

Why is K75 2.0 better than SR32?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 2,080 m+31%
  2. Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 1,081,600 cd+71%

Why is SR32 better than K75 2.0?

  1. Maximum output6,500 lm vs 120,000 lm18.5×
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam K75 2.0Acebeam K75 2.0≈ $3509.4
Imalent SR32Imalent SR32≈ $680
Light output
Maximum output6,500 lm120,000 lm
Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd1,081,600 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m2,080 m
Runtime at maximum output1 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED makerLuminus—
Battery & charging
Maximum runtime31 h—
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare