- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L35 2.0 vs P20
Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Acebeam P20
What L35 2.0 does better (1) and where P20 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is L35 2.0 better than P20?
- Maximum runtime288 h vs 74 h3.9×
Why is P20 better than L35 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)650 m vs 1,454 m2.2×
- Peak beam intensity105,620 cd vs 528,529 cd5×
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 5,600 lm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 5,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 105,620 cd | 528,529 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 650 m | 1,454 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 288 h | 74 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
