- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L35 2.0 vs TM9K Pro
Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Nitecore TM9K Pro
What L35 2.0 does better (2) and where TM9K Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is L35 2.0 better than TM9K Pro?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)650 m vs 509 m+28%
- Peak beam intensity105,620 cd vs 64,770 cd+63%
Why is TM9K Pro better than L35 2.0?
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 9,900 lm+98%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 9,900 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 105,620 cd | 64,770 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 650 m | 509 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | NiteLab UHi 40 MAX |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 288 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
