- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L35 2.0 vs Seeker 4 Pro
Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Olight Seeker 4 Pro
What L35 2.0 does better (2) and where Seeker 4 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Brightness & throw7.6
Why is L35 2.0 better than Seeker 4 Pro?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)650 m vs 260 m2.5×
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 4,600 lm+9%
Why is Seeker 4 Pro better than L35 2.0?
Seeker 4 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 4,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 105,620 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 650 m | 260 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 288 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
