- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs X75
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Acebeam X75
What X50 2.0 does better (0) and where X75 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is X50 2.0 better than X75?
X50 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X75 better than X50 2.0?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 67,000 lm+49%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 1,173 m+20%
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 343,982 cd+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 67,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 343,982 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 1,173 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 55 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 5.5 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 756 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
