- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs LR36R
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Fenix LR36R
What X50 2.0 does better (1) and where LR36R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is X50 2.0 better than LR36R?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 10,000 lm4.5×
Why is LR36R better than X50 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 1,260 m+29%
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 396,900 cd+66%
- Weight756 g vs 493 g+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 10,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 396,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 1,260 m |
| Light source | LED | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Luminus SST-25 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 25 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | — | 102 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | 160.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 56.2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 55.1 mm |
| Weight | 756 g | 493 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
