- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs LR40R V2.0
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Fenix LR40R V2.0
What X50 2.0 does better (4) and where LR40R V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Brightness & throw9.1
3.3Build & durability4.2
Why is X50 2.0 better than LR40R V2.0?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 15,000 lm3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 900 m+9%
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 202,500 cd+18%
- Weight756 g vs 842 g+11%
Why is LR40R V2.0 better than X50 2.0?
LR40R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 15,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 202,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 900 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 6 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 177 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | 175 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 82 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 55 mm |
| Weight | 756 g | 842 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 16 |
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
