- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs LR50R
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Fenix LR50R
What X50 2.0 does better (4) and where LR50R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is X50 2.0 better than LR50R?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 12,000 lm3.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 950 m+3%
- Weight756 g vs 987 g+31%
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 225,620 cd+6%
Why is LR50R better than X50 2.0?
LR50R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 12,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 225,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 950 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 16,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 58 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | 163 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 88 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 60 mm |
| Weight | 756 g | 987 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 6 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
