- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs LR50R V2.0
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Fenix LR50R V2.0
What X50 2.0 does better (4) and where LR50R V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Brightness & throw9.2
3.3Build & durability4.2
Why is X50 2.0 better than LR50R V2.0?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 18,000 lm2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 846 m+15%
- Weight756 g vs 1,150 g+52%
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 178,930 cd+33%
Why is LR50R V2.0 better than X50 2.0?
LR50R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 18,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 178,930 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 846 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 6 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 46950 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 32,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 195 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | 217.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 89.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 53.9 mm |
| Weight | 756 g | 1,150 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
