- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs DX80
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Imalent DX80
What X50 2.0 does better (5) and where DX80 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is X50 2.0 better than DX80?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 32,000 lm+41%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 806 m+21%
- Weight756 g vs 1,204 g+59%
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 162,600 cd+47%
- Submersible to2 m vs 1.5 m+33%
Why is DX80 better than X50 2.0?
DX80 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 32,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 162,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 806 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 168 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 756 g | 1,204 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
