- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs MS32
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Imalent MS32
What X50 2.0 does better (0) and where MS32 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is X50 2.0 better than MS32?
X50 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MS32 better than X50 2.0?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 200,000 lm4.4×
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 654,480 cd2.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 1,618 m+66%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 200,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 654,480 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 1,618 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 756 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
